
0% read · 2 min left
Flexibility is joint-specific, so norms are tied to a specific test (e.g., sit-and-reach) and stratified by age and sex — and "more" is not always "better."
There is no single whole-body flexibility score; flexibility is joint- and motion-specific, so each test has its own norms. The sit-and-reach has the most widely published age- and sex-specific percentile tables (ACSM / CSEP trunk-forward-flexion norms), typically sorting results from needs improvement → excellent.
Illustrative sit-and-reach reference (standard box, foot line at 26 cm; "good" band): (use the matching protocol's current table; values differ by box zero-point)
| Age | Men "good" ≈ (cm) | Women "good" ≈ (cm) |
|---|---|---|
| 20–29 | ~34–40 | ~37–41 |
| 30–39 | ~33–38 | ~36–41 |
| 40–49 | ~29–35 | ~34–38 |
| 50–59 | ~28–35 | ~33–39 |
General patterns: women score higher than men at all ages; flexibility tends to decline with age but is highly trainable. For ROM measured by goniometry, compare to normal degree ranges (goniometry).
Interpretation caveat: adequate, balanced flexibility supports function, but hypermobility is not protective and excess range without stability can raise injury risk (flexibility-not-always-needed). Interpret toward balanced, functional ROM, not maximal range.
Educational content only — not medical advice. Always consult a qualified professional for individualized guidance, especially around injury, pregnancy, or medical conditions.