Fysiqal
Assessment
Assessment

Functional Movement Screen (FMS) — Overview

2 min read
Sources and review status

Review pending — this text hasn’t been signed off by a reviewer yet.

See this lesson’s sources
movement-screenfmsmovement-qualitymobilitystabilityinjury-risk

0% read · 2 min left

DefinitionA short reference note, not a full lesson.
Definition

A seven-task movement-quality screen scored 0–3 per task (max 21) that flags mobility/stability limitations and asymmetries to guide corrective work — a qualitative screen, not a fitness test.

Detail

The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) rates fundamental movement quality across seven tasks, each scored 0–3 (3 = clean, 2 = completes with compensation, 1 = cannot complete, 0 = pain during the movement). Maximum composite = 21.

The seven tasks:

  1. Deep squat
  2. Hurdle step
  3. In-line lunge
  4. Shoulder mobility (with an impingement clearing test)
  5. Active straight-leg raise
  6. Trunk-stability push-up (with a press-up clearing test)
  7. Rotary stability (with a posterior rock-back clearing test)

Use: identify limitations and left/right asymmetries to target with corrective exercise, and screen before loading. A pain (0) on any task should be referred for evaluation. Asymmetries (different scores left vs. right) are emphasized regardless of total.

Evidence caveat: the once-popular composite ≤ 14 = elevated injury risk cut-point has weak/inconsistent predictive validity in research and should not be used as a standalone injury predictor. The FMS is best treated as a movement-quality screen informing programming, not a diagnostic or strong injury-prediction tool. (predictive-validity claims are contested)

Key facts

  • 7 tasks, each scored 0–3 (0 = pain); composite max 21; 3 clearing tests included.
  • Tasks: deep squat, hurdle step, in-line lunge, shoulder mobility, active SLR, trunk-stability push-up, rotary stability.
  • Emphasizes asymmetries and pain (refer on any 0).
  • The ≤14 injury cut-point is not reliably predictive — use FMS to guide corrective work, not to predict injury.

Connections

Sources

Cited in text — not yet linked
Cook, Burton & Hoogenboom, FMS framework; systematic reviews on FMS injury-prediction validity (e.g., Bonazza et al., Moran et al.).

Exercise guides

Keep this lesson, or ask how it applies to you.

Educational content only — not medical advice. Always consult a qualified professional for individualized guidance, especially around injury, pregnancy, or medical conditions.